Skip to content
NewOntario OHSA Administrative Monetary Penalties are now active. Read the guide
← All case studies
Case · Workplace Investigations

Systemic Equity Transforming Hiring Practices in a Provincial Government Agency

Deep equity investigation into hiring practices within a 400-person unionized agency revealed systemic discrimination patterns. Remediation became a model for other government agencies.

Public Sector / Government7 months
Bright boardroom interior with tall windows overlooking an urban setting
[ workplace investigations ]

Tribunal complaint withdrawnGrievances down 60%Zero complainant attritionMethodology adopted by peers

47
Promotion decisions reviewed
60%
Union grievances reduced
94%
Manager equity training
28%
Promotions to underrepresented
The problem

What they came to us with.

A provincial government agency with 400+ employees faced a growing equity crisis. Three formal discrimination complaints had been filed alleging differential treatment in promotions, and the union had fielded 15 additional informal complaints from racialized employees and women — a pattern, not a series of isolated incidents. The situation had escalated: a media inquiry was pending, a Human Rights Tribunal complaint had been filed, and union grievances were moving to arbitration. Prior internal investigations had failed to resolve concerns. The agency needed an independent investigation that could satisfy legal requirements, union protections, Tribunal scrutiny, and internal credibility — and recommend structural remediation, not just individual accountability.

Method

How the work actually ran.

  1. 01

    Promotion decision review

    Reviewed all 47 promotion decisions over 4 years and mapped the demographic composition of candidate pools, selected, and rejected candidates.

  2. 02

    Documentation analysis

    Analyzed 200+ evaluation forms and interview notes for consistency of criteria and patterns in tone and language by demographic group.

  3. 03

    Stakeholder interviews

    Interviewed 11 managers, 6 HR staff, 3 formal complainants, and 8 additional employees sharing pattern concerns — using consistent structured protocols.

  4. 04

    Comparative qualifications

    Conducted comparative qualification analysis: tested decision rationale for cases where rejected candidates had equal or superior qualifications to selected candidates.

  5. 05

    Policy redesign + union partnership

    Identified documentation gaps, lack of structured interviews, and inadequate manager training; maintained union partnership throughout with collaborative input on systemic issues.

This engagement drew on
The systemic findings were harder to hear than individual accountability would have been, because they revealed our own role in enabling discrimination. But that systemic focus made the solution possible. We didn't just terminate someone; we built systems that actually operate fairly.
Executive DirectorProvincial Agency
Similar problem?

Tell us what you’re facing. We operate from there.

Most first conversations happen on a call within the week. We respond personally within one business day.