Skip to content
NewOntario OHSA Administrative Monetary Penalties are now active. Read the guide
← All case studies
Case · Workplace Investigations

Restoring Integrity Harassment Investigation in a 300-Person Tech Company

Independent investigation into harassment allegations against senior leadership resulted in substantiated findings, termination, and a culture remediation program that doubled employee trust scores within 12 months.

Technology / Software4 months
Overhead view of a collaborative team working across laptops, tablets, and documents
[ workplace investigations ]

Findings substantiatedTermination + remediationTrust scores doubledZero complainant attrition

75%
Substantiation rate
16wks
Investigation duration
72%
Confidence in HR (post)
100%
Managers trained in 60 days
The problem

What they came to us with.

A 300-person Canadian software company faced an institutional crisis. Four employees across different departments had filed formal harassment complaints against a senior director of product development — inappropriate sexual comments, deliberate exclusion from meetings, and intimidating behavior during team interactions. The respondent held authority over hiring and promotion decisions, creating a power differential that had suppressed reporting for 18 months. The company's HR team lacked investigative expertise for this complexity, and an internal investigation risked being perceived as biased. How the company responded would signal whether conduct standards applied equally regardless of seniority.

Method

How the work actually ran.

  1. 01

    Document preservation

    Issued document preservation notice securing all email, calendar, and communication records. Reviewed 200+ threads for corroboration before interviews began.

  2. 02

    Complainant intake

    Conducted four detailed complainant intake interviews establishing 11 specific incidents across 18 months. Built a chronological evidentiary spine before approaching witnesses.

  3. 03

    Witness protocol

    Interviewed 15 witnesses across three categories — direct, contextual, and corroborating — using consistent structured protocols to enable credibility comparison.

  4. 04

    Respondent response

    Provided respondent with detailed allegations and 10 business days to prepare a formal response with legal counsel present. No surprise, no pretext.

  5. 05

    Findings

    Cross-referenced respondent's account against email evidence, calendar records, and witness testimony. Applied a rigorous credibility framework against the balance-of-probabilities standard. Findings on each allegation.

The 1205 team brought structure and credibility to an investigation that could have been compromised by internal bias. Their procedural rigor gave us confidence that findings would hold up legally and culturally. Most importantly, they helped us restore integrity to our workplace.
General CounselTechnology Company
Similar problem?

Tell us what you’re facing. We operate from there.

Most first conversations happen on a call within the week. We respond personally within one business day.