Skip to content
NewOntario OHSA Administrative Monetary Penalties are now active. Read the guide
HR Services · Ontario · Cost & fit

What does HR cost in Ontario?

Three models — fractional, outsourced, or project HR — and which one fits your headcount. One click below maps your size to the right model, with current published ranges on our Canada cost guide. No obligation, no sales sequence.

Investigations · Culture · Outsourced HR · One principal accountable

Fractional HR
Under ~100 staff · first senior HR layer
Monthly retainerPublished range →
Outsourced HR
50–500 staff · full function
Monthly retainerPublished range →
Project HR
Any size · scoped, time-bound work
Billed hourlyPublished range →
Get a tailored range

Your size, your number.

One click — pick your headcount and the right model appears instantly, on screen; current ranges by model are published on our HR cost guide. If you want it in writing, tailored to your compliance exposure, add your email after. No obligation, no sales sequence.

Prefer to talk now? Call the principal · (647) 631-1205

Your headcount

Investigations, culture, outsourced HROne principal accountableone-business-day triage on active issuesDeliverables reviewed by a named senior practitioner

1business day
Triage on active complaints
3paths
Investigations · culture · outsourced HR
15
Published engagement briefs
2019
In practice since
What holds up in production

Embedded HR infrastructure. Built for Canadian mid-market.

Outsourced HR for Canadian mid-market employers covers Ontario compliance (ESA, OHSA, AODA, Pay Equity), employee relations, and operational HR — all documented to stand ready for MOL inspection, HRTO processes, and leadership turnover.

Compliance Rigor

Ontario ESA, OHSA, AODA, and Pay Equity Act as the floor, not the ceiling. Policy infrastructure built and documented for MOL inspection, HRTO processes, and HR Director turnover — so an independent reviewer can follow the record.

Mid-Market Fluency

Fifty to five hundred employee operations are the whole practice. We know the transition points where HR systems break: the first layoff past one hundred, the first payroll-tax audit, the first harassment complaint that needs an independent investigation.

Operational Embedding

We operate inside your cadence, not adjacent to it. Leadership meetings, managerial escalations, comp cycles. The function runs, not documents itself.

Engagement models

Three ways to buy HR without overbuying.

Fractional HR is part-time senior HR on a monthly retainer, suited to 50–250-person companies. Project HR covers one-off needs, billed hourly. Embedded HR hands off the full function to us — the FAQ below covers which model fits which stage.

Many mid-market companies overbuy HR — a $200K+ VP People when a fractional leader would do, or a junior generalist when they need an embedded senior. The right model depends on company size, HR maturity, and the volume of work that demands senior judgment.

Project HR

Billed hourly

For one-off needs: a policy refresh, a single investigation, a compliance audit, an M&A people-due-diligence pass. Right when the work is bounded and you have no ongoing HR exposure. Wrong when you keep coming back for "one more thing" — that signals you need an ongoing model.

Fractional HR

Monthly retainer

Senior HR coverage on a part-time retainer. Right for companies under ~100 employees who need VP-level judgement (succession planning, comp design, manager coaching) but cannot justify a $200K+ salary. We sit on your leadership calendar; we are not a help-desk.

Embedded HR

Monthly retainer

Full operational ownership of the HR function. Right when HR has to come off the founder’s plate completely. We run hiring intake, employee relations, compliance, and policy — with a documented playbook the company keeps when we leave.

Current ranges for each model are published on the HR services cost page — and confirmed in a written scope before any work starts.

HR at scale

What mid-market HR actually looks like.

At 50 employees, one generalist plus founder oversight is typical. By 150, litigation exposure demands fractional senior support. At 350+, a VP-level HR Director with embedded specialists becomes the right answer.

The HR workload and risk profile inside a 50-person company is not a smaller version of what it looks like at 350. Different talent, different exposure, different right answer. Three reference points we see most often:

50 employees

Founder + part-time HR

One generalist juggling onboarding, ESA compliance, benefits administration, and the founder’s ad-hoc requests. The risk profile is compliance gaps — missed AODA accessibility reports, misclassified contractors, and unenforceable non-compete clauses written before Bill 27. Common mistake: hiring a recruiter and calling it HR.

150 employees

HR generalist + outside support

You now have employee relations volume — a complaint every 4–6 weeks, manager-employee disputes that escalate, leave administration that consumes a full FTE. The risk profile shifts to litigation exposure (wrongful dismissal, human rights claims), and the cost of getting any single matter wrong climbs quickly. Time to graduate from project HR to fractional.

350 employees

HR Director + embedded specialist support

You need a full HR leader with VP-grade authority, plus specialists in talent acquisition, compensation, and employee relations. Founder is no longer the last decision-maker on people matters. Risk profile is strategic — talent loss to competitors, comp benchmarking drift, succession gaps in the management layer. Embedded HR or an internal VP People is the right answer here.

Ontario compliance stack

Six statutes. Six common gaps.

Ontario employers must comply with the ESA, OHSA (including Bills 168 and 132), AODA, the Human Rights Code, the Working for Workers Acts (Bills 27 and 79), and the Pay Equity Act — each with its own most-common gap.

Many mid-market Canadian employers are operating in partial compliance and do not know it. The Ontario regulatory stack has grown denser over the past five years — three significant new obligations since 2022 alone — and the penalty regime has moved from administrative slap to court-orderable fines and personal liability for directors. Here is what you owe, with the most common gap we see at each layer.

Employment Standards Act (ESA)

Minimum standards on hours, overtime, vacation, leaves, and termination. Most common gap: misclassification of employees as independent contractors. The CRA and the Ministry of Labour each apply their own tests — a relationship in doubt under one deserves review under both, with counsel confirming before you rely on it.

OHSA, Bill 168 & Bill 132

Statutory duty to assess workplace risk, post policies, train all employees, and investigate every harassment or violence complaint. Most common gap: companies have the policy posted but no documented investigation procedure — the duty to investigate is where the exposure concentrates, not the policy itself.

AODA

Multi-year accommodation, accessibility, and reporting obligations under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Most common gap: missed compliance reports (due every 3 years for employers with 20+ employees) and inaccessible job postings.

Ontario Human Rights Code

Protections against discrimination across 17 grounds. Most common gap: failure to accommodate to the point of undue hardship — companies stop accommodating when it gets inconvenient, which is the wrong test.

Bill 27 & Bill 79 (Working for Workers)

Newer obligations on disconnect-from-work policies, non-compete restrictions, and electronic monitoring transparency. Most common gap: employer has not updated employment agreements or handbooks since 2022 — the non-compete prohibition alone is reason to have employment counsel review agreements written before 2022.

Pay Equity Act

Continuous obligation to maintain pay equity between female- and male-dominated job classes for employers with 10+ employees. Most common gap: companies completed the original 1990s plan and never refreshed it through subsequent reorganisations and acquisitions.

What we do not do

The shorter list matters more.

We do not run payroll, provide legal opinions, or recruit — three areas where specialist firms outperform generalists. The FAQ below covers a broader list of work that should stay in-house.

Firms that promise to do everything tend to do nothing particularly well. Three things we deliberately do not do — and the reason matters:

We do not run payroll

Payroll is a transactional, software-led function. Our retainer assumes you have a payroll provider (Ceridian, ADP, Payworks, or an internal team) already in place. We advise on payroll compliance; we do not process cheques.

We do not provide legal opinions

On any matter that carries real litigation risk, you need employment counsel — not an HR consultant. We work alongside your existing counsel, or refer to vetted firms when you do not have one. We will tell you the risk; we will not tell you the law.

We do not recruit

We advise on hiring process, interview design, scorecards, and offer architecture. We do not source candidates or run executive search. Recruiting is an entirely different competency and the firms that do both rarely do either well.

Method

Five steps. Triage to hand-off.

An HR engagement runs five phases: triage within one business day, compressed discovery and a written recommendation, a delivery start confirmed in the written scope, a weekly operating rhythm, and a defined hand-off with a durable artifact.

  1. 01

    Intake & scope

    Triage call to map your situation to the right path — investigation, culture work, outsourced HR, or a combination. We confirm conflicts, name a principal, and issue a written scope before any work starts.

  2. 02

    Diagnose

    Compressed discovery. Documents, interviews, data. We produce a written recommendation with timeline, cost, and exit criteria — even if that recommendation isn’t us.

  3. 03

    Deliver

    Start timing is confirmed in the written scope. One principal accountable across the engagement — investigation lead, culture program director, or senior HR leader in-seat — not a handoff to juniors.

  4. 04

    Operating rhythm

    Weekly updates. Deliverables are reviewed by a named senior practitioner; where legal advice is required, the client’s counsel or separately engaged counsel must provide it. Monthly metrics and compliance pack. Leadership cadence held on the calendar, not ad-hoc.

  5. 05

    Hand off

    A durable artifact stays — a documented investigation report an independent reviewer can follow, an embedded culture rhythm, or a documented HR function with an in-house successor on-boarded. We leave on a defined date.

Next step

Tell us what's on your desk. 30 minutes.

One firm can hold both mandates only when the line between them is real. The investigation mandate is limited to independent fact-finding and the agreed report. Any remediation, training, policy, or HR support is separately scoped after findings are delivered and only where independence, fairness, and client counsel permit it.
Ghaleb El MasriFounding Principal · 1205 Consulting
Common questions

What mid-market employers ask before they retain us.

Before retaining an HR firm, mid-market employers typically ask what services are covered, response times for active complaints, Ontario compliance standards, fractional vs. full outsourcing vs. internal hiring, and cost — all answered in full below.

What HR services do you provide to Ontario employers?
We cover three engagement paths: workplace investigations, culture transformation programs, and outsourced HR (fractional or full-function). Clients typically start with one path — often an active complaint or culture issue — and stack others over time.
How quickly can you respond to an active workplace complaint?
Active complaints get a triage call within one business day, and a written scope within 48 hours on urgent matters — including a conflict check and a named lead. The written scope sets the expected investigation timeline. Timing depends on participant availability, evidence volume, complexity, and any parallel legal or workplace process.
Are your HR services compliant with Ontario employment law?
Engagements are built around ESA, OHSA, AODA, the Ontario Human Rights Code, and pay-equity obligations. Investigations are led by an AWI-trained investigator of record, and each engagement has a named senior lead accountable for the work.
Do you replace an in-house HR team or complement one?
Both. For companies without HR, we run the full function. For companies with an overwhelmed HR team, we come in on a specific mandate — an investigation, a culture program, a compliance rebuild — and hand back when stable.
What does an HR engagement cost?
Investigation fees are quoted after intake, based on the number of parties, evidence volume, urgency, jurisdiction, and reporting scope. You receive a written fee and scope before work begins. Culture programs run quarterly. Outsourced and fractional HR run on monthly retainers — current ranges by model are published in our HR services cost guide, and we quote a transparent monthly rate before any work starts.
When is fractional HR the right model vs. full outsourcing vs. hiring internally?
Fractional HR fits companies under ~100 employees that need VP-level strategic work without a $200K+ salary. Full outsourcing fits companies that want HR completely off the founder’s plate. Internal hiring becomes the right answer above ~500 employees or when M&A and restructuring volume justifies dedicated bandwidth. Many companies cycle through all three as they grow.
How quickly can outsourced HR cover for a departing in-house HR leader?
Onboarding timing is confirmed in the written scope. A straightforward transition covers documentation review, employee communication, and active-matter handoff; complex transitions (active grievances, pending litigation, M&A in flight) are scoped to include an overlap period with the departing leader.
What HR work should not be outsourced?
Highly confidential matters involving the founder, board-level executive comp decisions, and culture work that requires deep day-to-day employee relationships. We routinely advise on these but do not own them — that ownership stays with the CEO, board, or designated internal leader.
How does fractional HR compliance hold up if there is a Ministry of Labour audit?
The employer remains responsible to the Ministry of Labour — outsourcing execution does not outsource the duty. What a credible provider adds is documentation: policies posted, training records, complaint and investigation procedures, and files an inspector can follow. Whether any specific risk transfers by contract depends on the agreement itself — have your counsel confirm before relying on it. Look for providers who carry E&O insurance and document their work.

The Human-Attested standard

AI in the workflow. A person on the hook.

AI assists. It never decides.

We use AI to move faster on research, drafting, and pattern-finding. It is a tool in the workflow — not the analyst, not the judgment, and not the author of what we deliver.

A senior human reviews and owns the work.

Every deliverable is reviewed and stood behind by a senior 1205 practitioner. The findings, the recommendations, and the file are human work product — attributable to a named person, not a model.

We escalate when the matter needs it.

Where a question crosses into regulated territory, we say so and route it to employment counsel or the appropriate regulated specialist. We would rather hand off than overreach.

We are clear about our boundaries.

1205 does not provide legal, immigration, tax, or certification services, and does not issue or guarantee any certification.

See how 1205 handles AI-assisted work, human review, regulated partner routing, and confidentiality in the Human-Attested Trust Pack.

Next step

Tell us what's on your desk. 30 minutes.

Active complaint, culture concern, or a hiring gap. One principal on the call — we diagnose fast and recommend a path forward, even if that path isn't us.

Or call direct:
(647) 631-1205